Some readers who have heard the term Smart
Growth might recall that the term somehow has something to do with zoning or
deciding whether to build a new strip mall or
similar sedentary activities. And they might think, 'Why should
I care about a new Walmart? I just want to fish, or watch birds, or (fill
in your favorite outdoor activity here).'
Stream Hugger has always been about
interpreting conservation issues in a way that is relatable to the general
public. I hope this particular post will explain how certain land use
decisions, even in already developed areas, can affect the environment in
surrounding undeveloped areas.
Smart Growth is a land use principle that
can be summed up in two words: common sense. Instead of allowing
unchecked sprawl in the hope of future prosperity and publicly funding
infrastructure with no regard for its long-term costs, we need to call a time
out. Take a deep breath. Get it through our heads that we are not
in a big, imaginary race against the neighboring municipality to get built-out
before they do so that we can get our share of the riches that developers
always promise. The ruse that we have to allow property owners to do
what they want with their hundred-acre parcels in the name of "property
rights" and "stimulating the economy" is hogwash, because every
other property owner in that community has a right to not have their properties
adversely affected by poorly vetted and illogical new development.
From the Smart Growth America website, "Smart growth means building
urban, suburban and rural communities with housing and transportation choices
near jobs, shops and schools. This approach supports local economies and
protects the environment." Let's focus on how Smart Growth can protect the
environment.
This big-box store has way more parking spaces than it needs, which needlessly creates more stormwater runoff than it should. |
Smart Growth,
however, is not just about what we
build. It’s also about where we build. Smart Growth encourages building more densely
in already developed areas – building where the people already are. If we
encourage development in areas in or near where people are already working,
going to school, shopping, and playing, we can minimize the footprint of new
development. Concentrating the growth
near existing uses helps to keep surrounding open spaces open so that they can
continue to absorb and filter stormwater runoff as nature intended.
A recently published study
showed that even modest increases in development density can significantly
reduce water quality problems associated with development. The study, from the
Chesapeake Bay watershed, found that when development was concentrated it
required about half as much impervious surface as sparsely developed land and resulted in 43% less polluting runoff stormwater runoff.
By focusing development on already-developed areas we are also preserving
wildlife habitat. Habitat loss is the main threat to 80% of the threatened and endangered species in the U.S.
Focusing growth
within an existing community, rather than outside of town on a greenfield,
helps preserve wildlife habitat, protects water quality and avoids the costs
associated with dispersed infrastructure.
Studies have found that smart
growth development helps bird
species flourish, with more birds and a greater diversity of species
in smart growth areas than areas with dispersed development. Protecting open
space, parks and farmland means strengthening existing communities, attracting
businesses, and avoiding the costs associated with supporting dispersed infrastructure. Communities with
well-maintained neighborhood parks and extensive park systems have been
shown to consistently attract and retain businesses.
Smart growth offers aesthetic and economic
advantages for our communities. And it can protect wildlife habitat and water quality in the undeveloped areas that we rely on for rest and relaxation. We need to demand that our municipal
officials get on board with Smart Growth principles.
Good article but I question the necessity of throwing either the countryside or our towns to the developers. We already have enough people in many regions of the USA. Adding more people adds to traffic, crowding, carbon emissions, and American-style consumption. Adding more people benefits the developers, the bankers and the advertising-supported media, to the detriment of everybody else.The third option is not to choose the lesser of two evils, but the good. There are enough people in our region already.
ReplyDeleteAl
flame detection